I'm opposed to it because in reality the interpretation of whether something fits that definition is going to fraught with issues and likely to result in the ou

I'm opposed to it because in reality the interpretation of whether something fits that definition is going to fraught with issues and likely to result in the outlawing of anything that doesn't fit a right wing ideology. I'm particularly concerned because it's couched in language that deliberately denies the factual history of discrimination in America. It's also particularly concerned because the phrase >the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist Is at best, a controversial political opinion and not a statement of fact. For example, crafting an executive order to ban people from discussing the systematic oppression of black people seems to me like the act of a fundamentally racist country, I guess I better not bid for any government contracts.