> the tone at the beginning seems to be in a derisive tone I am frankly curious of what exactly you perceive as "derisive" in the first part of the article (fi

> the tone at the beginning seems to be in a derisive tone I am frankly curious of what exactly you perceive as "derisive" in the first part of the article (first paragraph?). I have to say that I subscribe to every single line of this article, which I find well argued and perfectly aligned with my views and concerns. And I am frankly surprised that anyone can describe it as "difficult to wade through". I find it very clear, simple, and absolutely reasonable even assuming a point of view different from my own.