4 ms·
In the same way in which one assumes pigs don't fly. You seem to be in the belief that 737 Max aircraft are uniquely predisposed to being hand flown around the
by VBprogrammer 6y ago
In the same way in which one assumes pigs don't fly. You seem to be in the belief that 737 Max aircraft are uniquely predisposed to being hand flown around the sky on the edge of the stall while in the clean configuration and are expecting evidence of the contrary to be provided to you.
- linuxftw 6y ago> expecting evidence of the contrary to be provided to you. I'm expecting evidence to confirm the assumptions of the system. I'm assuming any and all available data would be gathered and analyzed. I assume the MCAS system from top to bottom is riddled with bugs and flaws, designed by committee rather than engineers. There's no reason to trust any line of reasoning from Boeing on this matter, they've already demonstrated their incompetence and are not trustworthy. You seem to not want the FAA to verify the claims of the system with data. I don't know why that would be undesirable. Even if they only confirm what is being stated about MCAS activation, that data would be valuable and demonstrate that the FAA has at least the competence to gather the data. Publishing the raw data along with their conclusions would allow the public to verify their competence at drawing conclusions.