5 ms·
Apple was the ultimate outlier in that respect. It would be great if someone could pull this off for Mozilla. The odds are slim, but one can hope. Edit: Cal Pe
by kinleyd 6y ago
Apple was the ultimate outlier in that respect. It would be great if someone could pull this off for Mozilla. The odds are slim, but one can hope.
Edit: Cal Peterson's article clearly shows how we got here. Such a shame.
- jacquesm 6y agoIf played smart Mozilla could be another. I have some ideas about how this could be achieved but Mozilla in its present day configuration would never be able to make any of them work so I'm curious to see if and how they will get out of their current predicament. So far what I am seeing and hearing does not make me very hopeful. FF will be my daily driver until they stop updating it, where FF does not work I very reluctantly use Chrome. I suspect that if and when FF dies Chrome will no longer be available for Linux because the main reason for offering it (as an alternative to FF) will be gone.
- hoseja 6y agoThere is also a possibility they will start updating it with adware, IMO they've come close already.
- jacquesm 6y agoAuto update strikes again. I'll react to that when it happens. One of the main reasons I use firefox is because I hate advertising, if there is one thing that would make me jump ship that would probably be it.
- patrec 6y agoWhat makes you think Google will drop linux support? As far as I can tell it's in their interest to keep a (2nd class) linux version around: linux is no competitive threat to anything they do, a large fraction of their staff use linux machines, and leaving linux without any viable browser (killing it dead as a desktop and development platform) would concentrate a lot of money, smarts and political power into seeking alternatives that could pose a serious threat to Google.
- jacquesm 6y agoPrecedent. Companies tend to spend effort to keep others at bay but as soon as they are no longer a threat they move their effort elsewhere. As long as FF has a viable territory Chrome will be there to compete with it.
- tobr 6y ago> I have some ideas about how this could be achieved Could you expand on this?
- jacquesm 6y agoI did so in an earlier thread about Mozilla. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24121689 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24121689
- kinleyd 6y agoThose ideas look solid. It will require the board to make some critical decisions and there has to be a person for the moment. Do we have the analog to Steve Jobs in this situation - Brendan Eich?
- jacquesm 6y agoJWZ? That would be a fun turn-around, I think the bar/restaurant business is maybe not such a great spot to be in and it would be a nice return for him. For sure I'd trust him to do the right thing from a tech perspective.
- srtjstjsj 6y agoJWZ quit tech years ago because he hates other programmers. He's not going back to Mozilla
- tobr 6y agoThose are good points, and it’s frustrating that they don’t seem to be in Mozilla’s focus, but do you really believe this could lead to an Apple-style comeback?
- jacquesm 6y agoWell, I'd certainly hope so or I see myself as a Chrome user in a few years time and that's not the best possible future. I already have to for browser/midi stuff.
- qzw 6y agoSince ChromeOS itself is just a stripped down flavor of Linux, they can hardly just drop Linux support. Unless they also give up on ChromeOS, which is unlikely but not impossible for Google.
- jacquesm 6y agoIt would be trivial to stop supporting the linux version publicly while still allowing the ChromeOS one, it's not going to compile for regular linux if Google does not continue to put effort into that.
- srtjstjsj 6y agoIt's a one person effort to adjust a few flags to port ChromeOS app to Linux.
- jacquesm 6y agoThat's reassuring to know. I don't think I would want to give up linux as my daily driver OS and if there were no current browser for it that would be the end.
- fabrice_d 6y agoChromeOS graphics stack is not based on Wayland or X11, so if Google decided to ditch Linux and only support ChromeOS, you would have to maintain the Linux graphics port. That may or may not be a one person effort.
- tyingq 6y agoI thought that was one of the drivers for Fuschia.
- readams 6y agoGoogle uses Chrome on Linux internally. Most Google employees use it on their main computers. There's also ChromeOS.
- Stratoscope 6y ago> I suspect that if and when FF dies Chrome will no longer be available for Linux because the main reason for offering it (as an alternative to FF) will be gone. There is a bigger reason. Literally every software engineer at Google/Alphabet uses Linux, other than a very few exceptions (likely only a fraction of a percent). Even if your laptop is a Mac or Windows machine, your source code access is exclusively on your Linux box in the office. Google is a Linux shop. Regardless of their reputation for dropping products, Chrome on Linux isn't going away any time soon, for the simple reason that they need it internally.
- jacquesm 6y agoExcellent news. For now though, I sincerely hope that FF will somehow manage to stay alive, and that Mozilla will put all of their effort behind it.
- nobody9999 6y ago>FF will be my daily driver until they stop updating it, where FF does not work I very reluctantly use Chrome. I suspect that if and when FF dies Chrome will no longer be available for Linux because the main reason for offering it (as an alternative to FF) will be gone. I also use FF as my daily driver. However, should FF become unsupported, I'll go with Palemoon[0] rather than Chrome. In fact, there really isn't anything that could get me to use Chrome. I find its interfaces to be insulting to my intelligence and not at all friendly enough to the idea that I should never see ads or be tracked through my browser. [0] https://www.palemoon.org/ https://www.palemoon.org/ Edit: Added link to Palemoon.
- jacquesm 6y agoBookmarked.
- ksec 6y ago>Apple was the ultimate outlier in that respect. Yes and in Apple's case, no one could have pulled it off other than Steve Jobs. So basically the answer to the original question is none, zero.