3 ms·
Yes, should be, just because "double-u-double-u-double-u" takes a ridiculously long time to vocalize.
by cjbprime 16y ago
Yes, should be, just because "double-u-double-u-double-u" takes a ridiculously long time to vocalize.
- eru 16y agoThat's why sane languages use a different pronounciation. (By the way, world-wide-web is faster to say in English than double-u-double-u-double-u".)
- andybak 16y agoBut somehow more difficult both to pronounce and hear clearly.
- SeoxyS 16y agoI just go with 'dub dub dub…'
- jonhendry 16y agoShould've just been "web" instead of www. Because, really, what's the point of the "world wide" qualifier. Were there other network-oriented webs that the www might have been confused with? No.
- glhaynes 16y agoWorld Wide Web sounds more and more like Information Superhighway every year.
- Terretta 16y agoTrip-dub!