4 ms·
That argument is senseless: the organization is nonprofit, the workers are definitely not, nor should they be.
by lagadu 6y ago
That argument is senseless: the organization is nonprofit, the workers are definitely not, nor should they be.
- RobertoG 6y agoNot sure what you are trying to say here. We have an organization where, at the same time they don't have revenue enough for keeping its workers, the decision makers increase their salary. Never mind the legal structure of the organization, that doesn't look to me very ethical. At the same time, non-profits are suppose to have the mission of improving the world. I understand that the janitor doesn't care about the mission and just want to be payed, but the management should care, at least, about the optics. I, for sure, would not donate (1) to a non-profit if I think that my money is going to be used for buying Ferrari or houses in the Hamptons. (1) - https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/ https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/