2 ms·
In this case, the issue was that the prosecution apparently mislead the judge into believing the DVD was fully working when it wasn't [1]: >In her defence, Ms
by sohkamyung 6y ago
In this case, the issue was that the prosecution apparently mislead the judge into believing the DVD was fully working when it wasn't [1]:
>In her defence, Ms Parti said that in 2012 or 2013, Mr Liew's wife, Madam Ng Lai Peng, wanted to throw the DVD player away because it was broken, but agreed to let her take it back to Indonesia to fix.
>Madam Ng said in court, however, that the DVD player was not broken. At the trial, it was shown that the device could play a video digitally stored in the hard disk. However, a demonstration at the appeal showed that when a DVD was inserted into the player, the error message "could not initialise disc" was displayed.
>Justice Chan Seng Onn said a DVD player that is unable to play a DVD can reasonably be described as "spoilt". He found it likely that the Liews no longer wanted the "partially spoilt" player.
[1] https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/dvd-player-faulty-liew-couldnt-give-details-on-stolen-bags https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/dvd-play...