3 ms·

Any reputable analysis that tracks these campaigns throughout other years?

• r721 6y ago
  https://medium.com/dfrlab https://medium.com/dfrlab https://www.graphika.com/blog https://www.graphika.com/blog https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io
• IncRnd 6y ago
  While the following isn't really an ongoing analysis, it might help get you started. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin found that, among 938 global elections examined, the United States and Russia (including its predecessor, the Soviet Union) combined had involved themselves in about one out of nine (117), with the majority of those (68%) being through covert, rather than overt, actions. The same study found that "on average, an electoral intervention in favor of one side contesting the election will increase its vote share by about 3 percent," an effect large enough to have potentially changed the results in seven out of 14 U.S. presidential elections occurring after 1960. According to the study, the U.S. intervened in 81 foreign elections between 1946 and 2000, while the Soviet Union or Russia intervened in 36. A 2018 study by Levin found that the electoral interventions determined in "many cases" the identity of the winner. The study also found suggestive evidence that the interventions increased the risk of democratic breakdown in the targeted states." ~https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention