4 ms·

Ooh, if IntelliJ gets remote functionality I'll be very happy.

by vixit 6y ago

kamhh94 6y ago
I spoke to the team in KubeCon last year and they said “our research team is looking into it” with a hand wave. I doubt IntelliJ will actually implement this anytime soon, sadly.
- enjoylife 6y ago
  I agree and not saying they would get to it, but considering that was pre-COVID, I would imagine/hope they might reprioritize.
- FridgeSeal 6y ago
  Remote and Docker based Python environments have worked for a while in PyCharm.
rckoepke 6y ago
I use JetBrain's remote python interpreter functionality[0] with great success and convenience. For anyone whose development environment is appropriate for its use, I honestly cannot recommend it highly enough. It's only available under the full "Professional" license version, however. This uses SSH and SCP to automatically deploy the code to the remote environment and run it with the interpreter on that machine, rather than your own local laptop/desktop. One advantage is that it does not require any special software to be installed on the remote server. I believe VS Code's solution requires a pretty hefty installation consisting of basically an entire copy of VSCode onto the remote server. The downside of JetBrain's approach... I believe that it requires a local copy of the files in order to perform the "LSP"-like syntax error highlighting / suggestion functionality that JetBrains software is so lauded for. This could be difficult/inconvenient if your codebase is particularly enormous, or if you aren't allowed to mirror it locally. However, given the amount of support that JetBrains has for this kind of setup, I wouldn't be shocked to see an additional option for something more in the style of "VS Code Remote Development" 0: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/configuring-remote-interpreters-via-ssh.html https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/configuring-remote-in...

4 ms·

Ooh, if IntelliJ gets remote functionality I'll be very happy.

by vixit 6y ago

Ooh, if IntelliJ gets remote functionality I'll be very happy.

kamhh94 6y ago
I spoke to the team in KubeCon last year and they said “our research team is looking into it” with a hand wave. I doubt IntelliJ will actually implement this anytime soon, sadly.
- enjoylife 6y ago
  I agree and not saying they would get to it, but considering that was pre-COVID, I would imagine/hope they might reprioritize.
- FridgeSeal 6y ago
  Remote and Docker based Python environments have worked for a while in PyCharm.
rckoepke 6y ago
I use JetBrain's remote python interpreter functionality[0] with great success and convenience. For anyone whose development environment is appropriate for its use, I honestly cannot recommend it highly enough. It's only available under the full "Professional" license version, however. This uses SSH and SCP to automatically deploy the code to the remote environment and run it with the interpreter on that machine, rather than your own local laptop/desktop. One advantage is that it does not require any special software to be installed on the remote server. I believe VS Code's solution requires a pretty hefty installation consisting of basically an entire copy of VSCode onto the remote server. The downside of JetBrain's approach... I believe that it requires a local copy of the files in order to perform the "LSP"-like syntax error highlighting / suggestion functionality that JetBrains software is so lauded for. This could be difficult/inconvenient if your codebase is particularly enormous, or if you aren't allowed to mirror it locally. However, given the amount of support that JetBrains has for this kind of setup, I wouldn't be shocked to see an additional option for something more in the style of "VS Code Remote Development" 0: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/configuring-remote-interpreters-via-ssh.html https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/configuring-remote-in...