4 ms·
i wonder who would [over]play whom here. Exclusive for GPT-3 probably doesn't automatically mean GPT-4,5,... yet who is defining when GPT-3++ will be called GPT
by trhway 6y ago
i wonder who would [over]play whom here. Exclusive for GPT-3 probably doesn't automatically mean GPT-4,5,... yet who is defining when GPT-3++ will be called GPT-4... And speaking about any possible future lawyer tussles here - at some point the GPT-N will be pretty good at generating lawyer briefs - i mean not necessarily good briefs, just good enough to swamp any litigation into oblivion making a court battle effectively into a bot battle (not that current corporate court battles are far from that :).
- ghego1 6y ago> just good enough to swamp any litigation into oblivion This describes so we'll what the majority of lawyers would do with this tech that makes me laugh. The tech world: let's build AI to improve how the judicial system works and ensure fair and affordable trials to everyone! Lawyers: hey, cool AI you've got there, let's use it to start thousands of litigations and make a ton of money settling such cases that should never have been even initiated, sort of like the patent trolls.