3 ms·

Here are three options: # Option 1 (no pipes) import os for line in open("/etc/passwd").read().splitlines(): fields = line.split(":")

Here are three options: # Option 1 (no pipes) import os for line in open("/etc/passwd").read().splitlines(): fields = line.split(":") if fields[0] == os.getlogin(): print(fields[-1]) # Option 2 (Cheating, but not really. For most problems worth solving, there exists a library to do the work with little code.) import os print(os.environ['SHELL']) # Option 3 (pipes, not sure if the utf-8 thing can be done nicer somehow) import subprocess username = subprocess.check_output("whoami", encoding="utf-8").rstrip() p1 = subprocess.Popen(["grep", "^" + username, "/etc/passwd"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE) p2 = subprocess.Popen(["awk", "-F", ":", "{print $NF}"], stdin=p1.stdout, stdout=subprocess.PIPE) print(p2.communicate()[0].decode("utf-8"))

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago
Thanks, that does answer my question quite thoroughly:) I intended the question not as "how would I get my shell" but as a "how would I pipe commands together", which now that I think about it is perhaps the real issue: I think about solving many problems from the perspective of "how would I do this in /bin/sh?", but perhaps the real answer is that if you're doing it in Python (or whatever) then you should be writing a solution that's idiomatic in that language. Or if you like, perhaps one doesn't need to "standard library" of coreutils if one has the Python standard library, which means that many of the thing's I'd miss in Python are hard because they aren't the right solution there.
- sixstringtheory 6y ago
  Quickest and dirtiest way I've found, but yes, not idiomatic Python: subprocess.check_output("grep ^$(whoami) /etc/passwd | awk -F : '{print $NF}'", shell=True, encoding="utf-8").strip() I didn't test that particular line, but in general this is how I execute shell pipelines in Python.
  - yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago
    :) I agree that that works, of course, but if we have to use shell=True and just shove the whole thing like that then it loses a rather lot of the "Python" appeal. Still valuable if you need to feed the output into Python, of course.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago

Thanks, that does answer my question quite thoroughly:) I intended the question not as "how would I get my shell" but as a "how would I pipe commands together", which now that I think about it is perhaps the real issue: I think about solving many problems from the perspective of "how would I do this in /bin/sh?", but perhaps the real answer is that if you're doing it in Python (or whatever) then you should be writing a solution that's idiomatic in that language. Or if you like, perhaps one doesn't need to "standard library" of coreutils if one has the Python standard library, which means that many of the thing's I'd miss in Python are hard because they aren't the right solution there.

sixstringtheory 6y ago
Quickest and dirtiest way I've found, but yes, not idiomatic Python: subprocess.check_output("grep ^$(whoami) /etc/passwd | awk -F : '{print $NF}'", shell=True, encoding="utf-8").strip() I didn't test that particular line, but in general this is how I execute shell pipelines in Python.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago
  :) I agree that that works, of course, but if we have to use shell=True and just shove the whole thing like that then it loses a rather lot of the "Python" appeal. Still valuable if you need to feed the output into Python, of course.