that's a willfully obtuse reading. the safe harbor / privacy shield agreement was dq'd because US intelligence can reach into the data, thereby not meeting the

that's a willfully obtuse reading. the safe harbor / privacy shield agreement was dq'd because US intelligence can reach into the data, thereby not meeting the requirements of GDPR. facebook can't operate because it now lacks safe harbor, and is unable to meet the alternate requirements for data protection. it's a very interesting ruling, because SCC was upheld, and US intelligence can just as easily look into data transferred under SCC agreements. in my brief reading, users have to explicitly agree to allow export of their data under SCC though.