2 ms·
> I'm very surprised to see it often mentioned that NVMe M.2 vs SATA ain't noticeable. Here is loading times for windows and some blind tests: https://youtu.b
by Ygg2 6y ago
> I'm very surprised to see it often mentioned that NVMe M.2 vs SATA ain't noticeable.
Here is loading times for windows and some blind tests:
https://youtu.be/V3AMz-xZ2VM https://youtu.be/V3AMz-xZ2VM
https://youtu.be/4DKLA7w9eeA https://youtu.be/4DKLA7w9eeA
Your personal experience could be down to several factors.
For example - wear of your devices, how much your SSD was occupied, drivers, other components being updated as well, etc.
- ksec 6y agoWhat SATA Drive were they testing? Early SATA SSD has performance consistency problem, QD1 not as fast, etc.... they were way faster than HDD, but not perfect. NVMe started off with controller that has already been fine tuned, hence comparing them to SATA SSD tends to be a lot faster. Now if you have similar controller on NVMe and SATA you might only notice the difference in the video. But the context still matters.