3 ms·
> That's rather an industry criticism since these problems exist everywhere and are often direct consequence of trade off for looser coupling. No they don't. J
by valenterry 6y ago
> That's rather an industry criticism since these problems exist everywhere and are often direct consequence of trade off for looser coupling.
No they don't. Java is just not expressive enough, so library/framework authors have to decide between bloat or magic and they often choose magic for better or worse. There are languages that doing better in this regards.
- apta 6y ago> There are languages that doing better in this regards. Such as?
- valenterry 6y agoAs we are talking about Java, the closest language would be Scala. The language is much more flexible and powerful. This brings different problems onto the table, but it resolves the issue with awkward framework annotation/wiring problems that I have experienced in Java way to often.
- apta 6y agoWhat about languages not on the JVM platform?
- valenterry 6y agoYes there are also such languages which are not on the JVM platform!
- apta 6y agoI'm curious what they are in your view.