4 ms·
I checked Samsung server SSD SM863a MZ-7KM960N 960 GB. They claim 6,160TBW. It's using SATA and much slower than M.2 SSD though.
by vbezhenar 6y ago
I checked Samsung server SSD SM863a MZ-7KM960N 960 GB. They claim 6,160TBW. It's using SATA and much slower than M.2 SSD though.
- bserge 6y agoBut server hardware is more expensive and can be harder to get. They really should make a "high endurance" SSD model for consumers. I think many people would like that over benchmark speed. Personally, I can only saturate SATA 6 Gbps when doing backups.
- fomine3 6y agoIn 2D MLC era, 50-75TBW for 500GB drive was common. Now in 3D TLC era, 300TBW for 500GB or more is common. It's enough endurance already and that's why industry moving torward 3D QLC.