It seems "very weak" to you but not to me. There's a line between being a journalist and engaging in a conspiracy. The quote you provided is an attempt to blu

It seems "very weak" to you but not to me. There's a line between being a journalist and engaging in a conspiracy. The quote you provided is an attempt to blur that line. But, as far as the law is concerned, that line exists...and it exists to protect journalists. There's a reason journalists have lawyers in the room when they make these kinds of decisions. It wouldn't be surprising if Julian Assange -- not known for his carefulness -- crossed that line.