3 ms·

I don't think you'd want to whitewash Zenz as a Tibet-Xinjiang researcher when he is known to have said that he is on a religious mission against China. https:

• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
• SketchySeaBeast 6y ago
  Ok, so maybe the Zenz quote is out of place - I don't know his history, but I don't know think you can disregard the government documents by discrediting Zenz, especially as Reuters explicitly says it's investigated and corroborated some of those claims. > Reuters corroborated Zenz’s findings and found additional policy documents, company reports, procurement filings and state media reports that describe the program.
  • blkmm 6y ago
    > I don't know his history Many redditors have revealed Zenz's background. Please see the second half of the comments (top ones are the typical "China Bad" ones) https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ixjuq2/china_forces_500000_tibetans_into_labour_camps/ https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ixjuq2/china_for... What's interesting is that there is censorship in r/worldnews. After many people exposed Adrian Zenz's background and history, this post with 4k+ comments and nearly 50k upvotes got removed from r/worldnews front page and replaced by a new one with <200 comments and 1k upvotes which nobody got a chance to mention Adrian Zenz yet. The new one: https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ixhd7x/china_sharply_expands_mass_labor_program_in_tibet/ https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ixhd7x/china_sha...
• aww_dang 6y ago
  Attacking the bias and faith of Zenz instead of his argument is poor form. Doing so while linking to "The Gray Zone" is ironic.