3 ms·
I should be rather surprised if the FCC were the relevant body in Wales.
by heraclius 6y ago
I should be rather surprised if the FCC were the relevant body in Wales.
- richardwhiuk 6y agoYes, but Ofcom is, and has very similar legislation - https://www.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/interference-enforcement/spectrum-offences/jammers https://www.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/interference-enforcement/s...
- kube-system 6y agoThe TV isn’t a jammer though, it’s a misbehaving device. Both Ofcom, the FCC, and most regulatory bodies handle intentional interference differently than accidental interference. You still aren’t supposed to operate misbehaving devices, but regulators generally realize you might not know your device is bad.
- richardwhiuk 6y agoSure.
- kube-system 6y agoI was curious so I looked up UKs regulations. The phrasing that UK’s regulatory authority uses regarding interference is very similar to the FCCs part 15 regulations. > Anyone using electrical apparatus is responsible for ensuring that it does not cause harmful interference to others. If this happens, we may require the user to rectify the situation. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/interference-enforcement https://www.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/interference-enforcement
- formerly_proven 6y agoLaw concerning radio is very close to universal law.
- lima 6y agoAmazingly so! Even HAM radio regulations are remarkably harmonized internationally thanks to the IARU[1]. [1]: https://www.iaru.org https://www.iaru.org