5 ms·
As I read this, I can't help but think of how much easier it would be to get a "regular" Linux distribution running on most of the MikroTik routers if they woul
by jlgaddis 6y ago
As I read this, I can't help but think of how much easier it would be to get a "regular" Linux distribution running on most of the MikroTik routers if they would upstream -- or release or even publish -- their changes, kernel configurations, and such.
Instead, they're basically selling devices running a "proprietary" Linux and, IMO, leeching off of the kernel development community and others.
Fortunately, the OpenWRT community has, over the years, managed to get OpenWRT running on many of the MikroTik devices. (Occasionally, depending on the particular device, there's a "performance hit" due to hardware acceleration that doesn't work without binary blobs from the vendor, for example, but they've certainly managed to make these devices for those of us who would prefer to not touch RouterOS!)
- justsomedood 6y agoWhat do you like about openWRT over routerOS?
- r1ch 6y agoFor me, I get to run whatever I want instead of being limited to whatever mikrotik has implemented, eg CAKE QoS, Wireguard and dnscrypt-proxy. I also feel much more confident in the open source applications like dropbear and uhttpd than Mikrotiks proprietary implementations which have had numerous security flaws over the years.
- MikusR 6y agoI didn't know that open source software has no security flaws.
- ahmedalsudani 6y agoThat’s not what GP said. Bad strawman :)
- jlgaddis 6y agoShort answer: choice, control, flexibility, and that warm, fuzzy feeling.