> > Drink driving is banned > Yet it still happens and claims innocent victims. [...] This is about choice. So there should be no drunk driving laws "because c

> > Drink driving is banned > Yet it still happens and claims innocent victims. [...] This is about choice. So there should be no drunk driving laws "because choice"? Your argument really does seem to be, "Laws are worthless, because people break them", because you repeat it several times. > This isn't a pandemic. It's a panicdemic. I would be ashamed if I had written what you had written. Where are your rational arguments? Where are your links to peer reviewed papers? Where is the moral, rational or intellectual integrity here?