4 ms·
Too bad the site is just whitepage without javascript.
by inetknght 6y ago
Too bad the site is just whitepage without javascript.
- mplewis 6y agoI'm sure they'd appreciate your pull request to fix that: https://github.com/codyogden/killedbygoogle https://github.com/codyogden/killedbygoogle
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- jfrunyon 6y agoWh- why is that a bad thing? What about it would be made better by JS?
- 9HZZRfNlpR 6y agoIt's just a document, html is the reasonable choice for things like that.
- codyogden 6y agoIf you want to PR and then maintain 200 html list item components by hand, you’re more than welcome to join as a co-maintainer. :)
- galvin 6y agoI'm guessing it's using static hosting so server side rendering is out of the question, but if you wanted to make it work without JavaScript a static site generator could be used to avoid having to maintain 200 list items manually.
- codyogden 6y agoI was being facetious. I know what SSG is.
- jamil7 6y agoWouldn’t a static site generator take care of that? Not being snarky just asking.
- codyogden 6y agoYes. It would. I was joking. I don’t feel the need to implement it. This project (outside of data) hasn’t really been updated since it launched. Someone tried to force TypeScript upon it, but I’m a big fan of “don’t overkill it.” At the time, SSG was (and is) overkill for my stupid, single page weekender.
- jfrunyon 6y agoOops. I misunderstood. I was really confused by this whole thread until I went back and looked at the page source and realized the person I replied to meant that with JS turned off, the page is blank.