38 ms·
Funnily enough, there was a ... syntax for inclusive ranges, but because when looking at code at a glance it is hard to distinguish between .. and ..., it was r
by estebank 6y ago
Funnily enough, there was a ... syntax for inclusive ranges, but because when looking at code at a glance it is hard to distinguish between .. and ..., it was replaced with the current syntax: ..=
- Dominear 6y agohave you seen this yet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVGO0NIO848 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVGO0NIO848