>> It's disqualifying because, in the case of furries, it started as a sexual fantasy. >I don't know where you heard that, but it's incorrect. Maybe that's te

>> It's disqualifying because, in the case of furries, it started as a sexual fantasy. >I don't know where you heard that, but it's incorrect. Maybe that's technically incorrect, but you should check out how the early coverage of furry culture was presenting it as[0]. Here is an interesting excerpt: "Early portrayal of the furries in magazines such as Wired, Loaded, Vanity Fair, and the syndicated sex column "Savage Love" focused mainly on the sexual aspect of furry fandom." 0.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom#Public_perception_and_media_coverage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom#Public_perception...