> It's disqualifying because, in the case of furries, it started as a sexual fantasy. I don't know where you heard that, but it's incorrect. There's a documen

> It's disqualifying because, in the case of furries, it started as a sexual fantasy. I don't know where you heard that, but it's incorrect. There's a documentary that delves into the history of the furry fandom: https://youtu.be/c2N1sFWRRf8 https://youtu.be/c2N1sFWRRf8 > Much of the furry community sees fursonas as a sexual choice. No, this is a myth that a lot of people outside our community believe. If you have a fursona, that's supposed to be a representation of you. Fursonas are about identity. It can also be about one's queerness (which is probably fair to say in general, considering 80% of the fandom is LGBTQIA+), but being queer doesn't mean "being sexual". https://furscience.com/research-findings/sex-relationships-pornography/5-1-orientation/ https://furscience.com/research-findings/sex-relationships-p... https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/feb/04/furry-fandom-subculture-animal-costumes https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/feb/04/furry-fandom... (Yes, there is a side to most fandoms that focused on adult entertainment, but that's not all of it.)