4 ms·
Twitter is a seriously rough and immature tool. It has no ability to intelligently handle identity or content types. It's confusing to many people, and generall
by aneth 15y ago
Twitter is a seriously rough and immature tool. It has no ability to intelligently handle identity or content types. It's confusing to many people, and generally has a style that will quickly appear dated once a well designed alternative gains critical mass.
A few years ago, the micro-blogging community was not big enough for a second player. Now it is, and Twitter will change or be overtaken by a more compelling alternative.
The simplicity of Twitter was once its strength, but like any technology, it must grow to meet the demands of its users. Facebook added chat, photos, a compelling platform, etc... Twitter is dead in the water right now.
Who wants to remember silly @handles? There isn't even a directory of official Twitter handles for companies.
Private group message applications are sprouting up everywhere - Twitter is just plodding along unaware that this is a huge need.
Who wants to see hideous bit.ly links instead of actual content?
Is 140 characters really the future? I doubt it.
Are third party services really necessary to embed media? Do users really need to figure out how to tape together 10 different services and clients to get a good experience?
Twitter needs to grow up, or it will die. And it will happen quickly - less than two years from the day a serious competitor gains steam.
- wyclif 15y agoHas anyone else noticed, in the recent spate of HN submissions on choosing company names and the matching domain name for startups that founders are saying things like, "check to see if the name is available on Twitter; if not you'll need to choose again." That's amusing, but unacceptable given the large amount of squatting on Twitter. Anyone here have any luck getting a company name from Twitter when it was squatted?