3 ms·
Why? At this point, why not just use raw HTML and CSS?
by jakearmitage 6y ago
Why? At this point, why not just use raw HTML and CSS?
- jjjbokma 6y agoMarkdown is way easier than HTML and CSS. I've been hand coding some stuff, but am happy that I can maintain my own tumblelog [0] using a single Markdown file which is processed by a static site generator I wrote [1]. Even though the blog is mostly a link blog using Markdown saves me a lot of time and headaches. [0] https://plurrrr.com/ https://plurrrr.com/ [1] https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog
- jakearmitage 6y agoOh, absolutely. But most markdown editors compile to HTML in real time. Or CLI tools.