4 ms·
What’s so weird is that DirectX has an entirely terrestrial naming system and .NET refuses to follow its example.
by jimbob45 6y ago
What’s so weird is that DirectX has an entirely terrestrial naming system and .NET refuses to follow its example.
- oceanswave 6y ago.net ultimate incoming
- mlvljr 6y agoNET Last. NET Eternal. Dot Nyet :/
- WorldMaker 6y agoWith .NET 5 things are going back to a "check the version number" naming system though. 5 is greater than .NET Core 3.x, .NET Framework 4.x, and .NET Standard 2.x, you can pretty much forget what Core/Framework/Standard entirely mean as soon as you can upgrade to 5. (And the next version is .NET 6.) It's one version number left now. (Also, DirectX tried to version number individual components at various points in its history so even DirectX "naming" isn't that straightforward at certain points in time in the past.)