3 ms·
You are factually wrong. Amnesty was granted remote access, and it was revoked. This has not happened to many other public observers. It seems you only read th
by mlthoughts2018 6y ago
You are factually wrong. Amnesty was granted remote access, and it was revoked. This has not happened to many other public observers.
It seems you only read the parts about physical access, and the point about space limitation might be valid in that case. But that part is merely a footnote. The real issue is the remote access being revoked.
- boomboomsubban 6y agoActually, around 40 other public observers from across Europe had the same access granted and then revoked. Many of them were from other countries, happy not to need to travel during the pandemic, and they woke up the morning of the first day to discover their access revoked.
- mlthoughts2018 6y agoSo you’re saying the humanitarian problem is even bigger than just Amnesty International. Not even other international observers can see whether the trial is fair. This is truly alarming, to a much bigger scale, in this case.