4 ms·

I was thinking this, $100k for taking on that level of risk?

• snovv_crash 6y ago
  It's amazing what a disgruntled employee will do, and how little it takes to make them do it.
  • WrtCdEvrydy 6y ago
    A survey says the you can compromise most employees for $500. I wanted to do a website called "Ransom Rewards" allowing you to sign up to ransomware your own employer and you could set your own price to pick up data for a research paper but it was considered unethical to even imply you could get paid to fuck over your employer :(
    • dalbasal 6y ago
      Maybe you should start by surveying the ethics board, and then just pay them $500 to find it ethical. Bootstrapping.
• dogma1138 6y ago
  $100K for a staffer that reviews merchants and product listings is probably more than their yearly salary, in fact it wouldn’t surprise me if it’s not even about double. This aren’t people on high comp packages the bulk of Amazon’s workforce even if you discount the warehouses isn’t paid SV salaries.
• dalbasal 6y ago
  Corruption cases are often like this. You look at the case itself and think "this money for that much risk?" Ehud Olmert was removed from office as Israel's Prime Minister for taking bribes (in exchange for rezoning) years earlier as mayor of Jerusalem. The amounts seem very petty. About $25k IIRCC. We actually went from Prime Ministership to jail over it. I suspect the reason these bribes always seem petty is that only a fraction are uncovered. These people take bribes regularly, sometimes for decades. They get busted for one or two.