It’s interesting. I’m looking at your comment and GP’s comment and there are two equally obvious ways to interpret the GP’s comment: - academia’s bureaucracy n

It’s interesting. I’m looking at your comment and GP’s comment and there are two equally obvious ways to interpret the GP’s comment: - academia’s bureaucracy not understanding the incentives they’re creating and the positive and negative consequences - the OP not understanding the intentional incentives and outcomes created by the academic bureaucracy