2 ms·
Of course, but marketing is marketing; if you blindly believe marketing headlines before doing your due diligence, I'm sorry to say, but it's a bit naive. If yo
by stingraycharles 6y ago
Of course, but marketing is marketing; if you blindly believe marketing headlines before doing your due diligence, I'm sorry to say, but it's a bit naive. If you look at pretty much any protocol out there that's implemented by multiple vendors, there are all small nuances and incompatibilities. Even extremely detailed specified protocols have incompatibilities; S3 not having a formal specification should make you expect even worse.
If you look at S3 implementations from the various clouds and NAS appliances and whatnot, you'll see that none of them is a 1:1 compatibilite with each other.
If you wanted to warn others that, instead of Minio not providing "full" S3 compatibility, but Minio does not provide S3 compatibility at all (which is what the title edit suggests), then I believe you are mistaken. Minio definitely provides S3 compatibility, all the main tools and SDKs can talk perfectly with Minio, it's just that there are different implementation details around the edges.
- vikrantrathore 6y ago> marketing is marketing I didn't believe it blindly and that's the reason there is a ticket, after thorough investigation of the error in code as well as self-hosted instance configuration and log file analysis. Also to make sure others do not need to go through the same long process of debugging, try to request the project maintainers to change this marketing claim as evident in the ticket. Please check the ticket and see for yourself. I did it to make sure others facing the same problem can see it before spending too much efforts to debug. I can see the amount of work minIO team has put in this project and again kudos to the team. Open source is hard and requires a lot of commitment. This is how open source works, you give back to community in the form of feedback, documentation, issues and if capable in code.