There is definitely something off about this article's timing. It is clearly designed to create outrage and contains weird factual errors about SARs, PEPs, and

There is definitely something off about this article's timing. It is clearly designed to create outrage and contains weird factual errors about SARs, PEPs, and BSA in general. Granted, a lot of this stuff is not common knowledge partly due to associated secrecy, partly due to most of it happening behind scenes, but the actual law and interpretations are on the books and not secret, so it is hard for me not to judge it more harshly. So what does that mean? Article is purposefully trying to sound more clickbaity than necessary to sell the story. For the record, there are some real issues with SARs and BSA, but the article mentioned none of them.