3 ms·
If that's what you think, you should really learn more about government. I don't think you have a clue. Many, many powers falling under executive branch (and
by supernova87a 6y ago
If that's what you think, you should really learn more about government. I don't think you have a clue.
Many, many powers falling under executive branch (and agencies') regulatory authority, which Congress does not go into N-th level detail about how to implement, have to go through significant public and internal review, and have good explanation.
If you're unfamiliar with this, you should read:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41546.pdf https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41546.pdf
https://www.federalregister.gov/uploads/2011/01/the_rulemaking_process.pdf https://www.federalregister.gov/uploads/2011/01/the_rulemaki...
- politician 6y agoWe are talking about two different things. Legislation is different from the inherent powers delegated by the Constitution. The Executive certainly can act in many ways without explaining itself to and obtaining authorization from Congress. It seems reasonable to assume that you’re familiar with this concept, so I’ll just chalk it up to a misunderstanding.
- roywiggins 6y agoExecutive agencies have to obey the Administrative Procedures Act which is not a high bar and yet the current administration doesn't always manage to clear it; it has had several policies turned back by SCOTUS for not being able to come up with a facially valid reason.
- resfirestar 6y agoSure, the executive has constitutional powers, but the powers used in this WeChat ban come from the National Emergency act and the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, not the constitution. So I think the misunderstanding comes from the fact that you’re talking about constitutional powers, which are not at issue here. Powers created by legislation are constrained by the statutes themselves and Administrative Procedure Act requirements.