6 ms·
Maybe their real estate will be cheaper, but if the city loses the income tax those higher earners and their luxury consumption, that loss of revenue is gonna f
by lr4444lr 6y ago
Maybe their real estate will be cheaper, but if the city loses the income tax those higher earners and their luxury consumption, that loss of revenue is gonna fall to the middle class to make up, a middle class putting net more children into the school system too. NYC's annual spending per capita is already one of the highest in the nation.
- necrotic_comp 6y agoThat makes the assumption that the highest-paid residents of the city are currently paying their fair share. I somehow doubt that, so I don't see the loss of revenue from their absence as great as predicted.
- handmodel 6y agohttps://www.empirecenter.org/publications/nycs-high-income-tax-habit/ https://www.empirecenter.org/publications/nycs-high-income-t... "1 percent of New York City residents generated 43 percent of city income taxes" While I am not saying the current rate is fair or perfect, to say that the city wouldn't be hurt by losing tax revenue ignores the fact.
- tetris11 6y agoI wonder how much the cost of having the millionaires (in terms of the average resident paying for food, rent, parking, etc) is offset by their large contribution
- handmodel 6y agoI know not everyone would agree with me - but I think local governments almost always agree that attracting high earners is good for the city. Not only do they make schools and local government better funded but the raising of prices usually means higher wages (and more possible jobs) for the working class. There is a reason once Detroit lost its high wage workers the city sorta collapsed onto itself.
- jjeaff 6y agoI'm sure it will hurt the city. But it should also be noted that income tax makes up about 60% of the budget, not all of it.
- cobookman 6y agoOr NYC can cut their budget. NYC spends 3.2 Billion on homeless services. https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-citys-spending-on-homeless-hits-3-2-billion-this-year-11558562997 https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-citys-spending-on-home... Not saying the cuts need to come from that segment, but let the sheer size of some of these budgetary items sink in.
- wombatmobile 6y ago> Not saying the cuts need to come from that segment Are you sure? You didn't mention any other segment.
- jjeaff 6y ago$88B annual police budget. Maybe we can find some wiggle room in that budget.
- fosk 6y agoDoes somebody know how much SF spends on police annually?
- pkaye 6y agoI think around $600M. https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/sites/default/files/Documents/PoliceCommission/Police%20Commission020718-BudgetPresentationFY2018-2019.pdf https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/sites/default/files/Docum...
- codyb 6y agoNYC’s entire budget this year is 88B I believe. The NYPD is about 5 of that if I’m recalling correctly. It was 96Bn last year minus the 8Bn in cuts as a result of the decrease in revenues occurring due to the pandemic. The NYPD, again off the top of my head, is about 7% of the annual budget? A far cry from many American cities which can spend between a quarter and a half of their budgets on policing (see Chicago, and LA for examples). But, there may still be wiggle room. I was pretty disgusted by their actions during the protests personally what with the shoving women to the ground hard enough to cause seizures and concussions, the driving vans into protesters, and whatnot. Also the discriminatory policing in mask enforcement. There’s gotta be a better way. I’m very curious about the efficacy of their anti terrorism efforts but have no data or really any idea on what they’re doing in that regard. The city is certainly safer than it used to be although violent crime seems to be ticking up nation wide, which I presume to be because everyone’s home rubbing shoulders in their neighborhoods instead of at work. Lots of variables in play.
- ramraj07 6y agoDoubt they will raise taxes more than what is already the highest rates in the country. More likely outcome is that as salaries across the spectrum decrease their spending will too. This has every chance of going well for the city as it does the other way. Hard to predict the second degree effects on things like crime anyway.
- hevelvarik 6y agoHas any major city ever drastically cut spending to address a secular trending down of tax revenue? Honest question, cause as far as I can tell modern cities just keep spending until they literally can’t at which point the city is long ago put a fork in it done. Color me skeptical that NYC has the electoral will to make wise fiscal decisions going forward.
- uncoder0 6y agoIs there really much middle class left in this country to speak of? [1] There is a bit but it's rapidly declining. [1] http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/files/2012/01/middle_class.gif http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/files/2012/01/middle_cl...
- vinay427 6y agoThanks for pointing this out. I wasn't actually aware of the consistency of this shift over time. I didn't love this graph, however, so I went looking and found far better displays (IMO) of this trend here: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/09/the-american-middle-class-is-losing-ground/ https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/09/the-american-midd... In particular, the following is more informative and doesn't rely on a zoomed-in axis to emphasize the change over time: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/12/ST_2015-12-09_middle-class-03.png https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2... It's also adjusted for household size: > In this report, “middle-income” households are defined as those with an income that is 67% to 200% (two-thirds to double) of the overall median household income, after incomes have been adjusted for household size.