3 ms·
>That would address some of the issues and not others, all of which were laid out in my original comment. (Hint: read the words after "Indian".) I originally l
by frequentnapper 6y ago
>That would address some of the issues and not others, all of which were laid out in my original comment. (Hint: read the words after "Indian".)
I originally literally quoted the entire sentence from your original comment, which came after "Indian". We could do without the snide remarks. I was genuinely trying to get your position, but all you are doing is making snide remarks and attempting to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are about the issue.
- ikeboy 6y agoYou twice made incorrect assumptions about what I believed. That's not necessary if you're just trying to understand it. Now you're asserting that I'm lacking some knowledge about the issue, without bothering to specify what knowledge, specifically, I might be lacking. This is not how good faith conversations tend to go.