3 ms·
> We're getting to the point where Intel is no longer able to deliver significant performance improvements inside a low TDP. But why are we comparing with Inte
by webmobdev 6y ago
> We're getting to the point where Intel is no longer able to deliver significant performance improvements inside a low TDP.
But why are we comparing with Intel chips, when it is AMD chips that have been more successful in delivering higher performance with lower TDPs?
- GeekyBear 6y agoThe numbers from those performance tests aren't all good news for AMD. >Against the x86 competition, Tiger Lake leaves AMD’s Zen2-based Renoir in the dust when it comes to single-threaded performance. >[In multicore] AMD’s platform scales incredibly well in execution-bound workloads as it fully takes advantage of double the core count. In more memory-heavy workloads, the Zen2 cores here seem to be lacking sufficient resources and scale below the performance of Intel’s 4-core designs in some workloads. We'll have to see what the testing figures look like after Zen3 and Apple Silicon ship.
- webmobdev 6y agoSure, but we are talking about ARM chips vs x86 chips, and so it would be more meaningful to compare ARM chips with AMD chips as AMD has made better strides than Intel in lowering TDP. Everyone would be more interested in how Apple ARM chips compare with AMD mobile and desktop Ryzen chips.