3 ms·
> (outcome using controlled dataset: 40 white to 52 black faces chosen). But that comment is heavily downvoted. Maybe because 1) If that's the comment you ref
by acqq 6y ago
> (outcome using controlled dataset: 40 white to 52 black faces chosen). But that comment is heavily downvoted.
Maybe because
1) If that's the comment you refer to, it also contains the claim "Misleading - it seems to be looking for contrast" which as far as I see isn't provably true?
2) in the end tweet of the experiment it's claimed: "I've created @cropping_bias
to run the complete the experiment. Waiting for @Twitter
to approve Dev credentials" and the https://twitter.com/cropping_bias https://twitter.com/cropping_bias is still empty at the moment?
Edit: personally, the interesting experiments for me are like "a person against a drawing" -- the simpler the competition is the bigger the chance to figure out what the "preference" could be:
https://mobile.twitter.com/griffonatrix/status/1307463528337547266 https://mobile.twitter.com/griffonatrix/status/1307463528337...
(Luckily, I don't depend on Twitter, but I'd suggest that those who do should have the chance to do the "manual override.")
- noxer 6y agoHe wants to collect more data. But current limited data shows no bias toward images from people with light skin tones.