> In 2100 we will be able to suck out CO2 Citation needed. > even if that was a problem which isn't even established yet. Could you explain what isn't even e

> In 2100 we will be able to suck out CO2 Citation needed. > even if that was a problem which isn't even established yet. Could you explain what isn't even established yet? So far it looks like your belief system prevents you from understanding any physics or chemistry where the results do not fit your values. You might want to look into that or maybe present a new system that explains other observations but where carbon dioxide behaves in a way that is your liking.