You are "proving" we are wrong by "assuming" the existence of a solution. This is a falacy. I would also argue that contextual awareness of a computer will nev

You are "proving" we are wrong by "assuming" the existence of a solution. This is a falacy. I would also argue that contextual awareness of a computer will never resemble the contextual awareness of a human being. That is because contextual awareness can only be derrived by actively participating in a culture, inherent attribute of human beings and not a thing computers can do. However, even if computers came to have contextual awareness as a human (again, i don't believe this is possible) that is something we would not want. Cultural differences produce different interpretations out of the same input. Example: Is it ok for a guy to get married with 10 women? Depending on your location on this world, the answer WILL be dofferent. Do you really want computers to interpret and (more importantly) act on their own based on some sort of contextual awareness they came up with? I'd say not.