6 ms·
I'll have to watch Adam's episode, but I watched a Netflix documentary five years ago (don't recall the name) that presented the argument that it was primarily
by animationwill 6y ago
I'll have to watch Adam's episode, but I watched a Netflix documentary five years ago (don't recall the name) that presented the argument that it was primarily the (cotton?) industry that lobbied to classify weed as illegal, because they wanted to destroy the hemp industry (and succeeded) as they were producing clothing.
So it sounds like original bad intent (destroy competition) led to it being abused for further bad intent (racism).
- CJefferson 6y agoI'm going to be honest, the argument that hemp is a generally great material has always seemed weak to me. There are plenty of countries where growing hemp is legal, and it still never seems to get much use.
- spenczar5 6y agoIt historically has had tons of use. It was pretty much the only material used for making rope for centuries in Europe, and was used widely in building construction too. Hemp cultivation was a crucial piece of colonial Virginia’s economy, heavily promoted by the British government, and it was used for clothing, sails, and even fine textiles as far back as the Viking age (eg, https://www.nature.com/articles/srep02686 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep02686). I could provide more references but I’m typing with thumbs - they are easy to find, though.
- CJefferson 6y agoSorry, should be clearer. It did indeed have historical uses. Not sure if it has much current ones.
- throw_away 6y agoAs the bootleggers and baptists phenomenon has shown, the drive for prohibition can come from multiple, disparate sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleggers_and_Baptists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleggers_and_Baptists