4 ms·
Yeah and in essence, just because the thing can communicate with you, doesn't mean it understands you. Especially when you consider all you have to do is follo
by dfischer 6y ago
Yeah and in essence, just because the thing can communicate with you, doesn't mean it understands you.
Especially when you consider all you have to do is follow a "translation layer" to repeat steps to produce an output, then it doesn't mean anything is understood. Just a "thing" that can follow steps consistently to produce a result.
It is quite an interesting concept when considering at what extent is there anything actually translated in any system that is understood or just an interface to reproducing an algorithm based on some consistent logic?
Fun stuff to me.