16 ms·
If eradication of 80-90% of population is "life improvement" for locals, then sure, their lives improved, only most of them died in the process of improvement.
by Pirgo 6y ago
If eradication of 80-90% of population is "life improvement" for locals, then sure, their lives improved, only most of them died in the process of improvement.
- rubble5 6y agoWhen it is 100% in comparison, then it is, isn't it?