3 ms·
The performance of DuckDB's predecessor, MonetDBLite, was/is stellar. DuckDB, when I tried in 6 months ago, was a bit behind in terms of csv parsing or aggrega
by ryndbfsrw 6y ago
The performance of DuckDB's predecessor, MonetDBLite, was/is stellar. DuckDB, when I tried in 6 months ago, was a bit behind in terms of csv parsing or aggregation by groups and didn't seem much faster than regular sqlite so I didn't really jump at it. Does anyone here know if the performance improved since then and how it compares to MonetDBLite?
- mytherin 6y agoWe are currently actively working on performance optimization, and have recently finished implementing parallelization. Expect more performance improvements soon :)