> nuance provider, or in other words: reality checkers If that were the case, they would be far less emphatic. In fact, since the science can "contradict itsel

> nuance provider, or in other words: reality checkers If that were the case, they would be far less emphatic. In fact, since the science can "contradict itself", they seem to be saying far more than they can justify. > It would also be a bad idea to start high dosing vitamin D unmonitored. I think when it's compared to the risk of contracting covid, 1000IU / day of vitamin D is justified. > exaggerated to believe that vitamin D can...prevent its spread Would it? I think we're finding that vitamin D is probably more effective than face masks. > layman will again begin to lose faith Lose faith in the ability of scientists to solve the problem, or lose faith in the PR folks that (demonstrably, sometimes obviously) don't tell the truth? Science is only 'about faith and beliefs' when the layman is told to believe specific people, or blindly obey the experts.