2 ms·
I'd argue that when Rust is considered as an alternative in one of the domains that C and C++ are prevalent today, the fact that it does not have a formalized s
by weinzierl 6y ago
I'd argue that when Rust is considered as an alternative in one of the domains that C and C++ are prevalent today, the fact that it does not have a formalized spec does actually hurt it today. For example: NVidia evaluated various languages to adopt for their "Safe Autonomous Driving" project. Rust was considered but didn't win. One of the reasons was literally:
"Does not have a formalized spec"
See [1] page 35.
[1] https://www.slideshare.net/AdaCore/securing-the-future-of-safety-and-security-of-embedded-software https://www.slideshare.net/AdaCore/securing-the-future-of-sa...
- lionkor 6y agoThe nvidia thing is part of why I wrote my comment, too, yeah. Was really eye opening to the requirements that some big players have