3 ms·
>This isn't even about social categories “Black” and “White”, it is literally about the direct correlates of skin colour. To expand upon this according to an ON
by kipchak 6y ago
>This isn't even about social categories “Black” and “White”, it is literally about the direct correlates of skin colour.
To expand upon this according to an ONS study "Blacks" in England and whales had a 1.9 times higher rate of dying compared to "Whites" after socioeconomic controls, while Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups were 1.6 times more likely.[1] This makes sense if you figure lighter skin was a evolved trait for those in latitudes that got less sun. [2]
[1]
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/coronavirusrelateddeathsbyethnicgroupenglandandwales/2march2020to10april2020 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsde...
[2]https://www.pnas.org/content/107/Supplement_2/8962 https://www.pnas.org/content/107/Supplement_2/8962
- secondcoming 6y agoWhales?
- Bud 6y agoLet's assume that was just a particularly hilarious typo for "Wales".
- kipchak 6y agoIndeed, though thinking about it people living in "whales" would probably have low vitamin D levels as well.
- umanwizard 6y agoI spent about 3 seconds wondering why in the world you were talking about whale vitamin-D levels, and thinking it was vaguely offensive that you were comparing ethnic/racial groups of humans to marine mammals. Then I remembered that Wales exists :)