4 ms·

I agree! It seems like it could have been anonymized. The government site I check regarding covid news that is local to me has the person’s age, sex, test resul

I agree! It seems like it could have been anonymized. The government site I check regarding covid news that is local to me has the person’s age, sex, test results, and county. I don’t see how vitamin d levels could be an identifier. Just venting - data during this pandemic has been one of the most frustrating parts for me. Data should be one of the tools we can use to get through this, but it’s been a struggle knowing what’s accurate and lack of certain information makes it hard to make good decisions.

xiphias2 6y ago
One interesting thing is that the Russian vaccine tests were criticized for not sharing raw data by lots of researchers from western countries as well. I'm definately taking vitamin D and not signing up for the Russian vaccine, but it seemed hypocrytical to me that only Russian researchers were shamed for not being transparent.
- hcknwscommenter 6y ago
  "One interesting thing is that the Russian vaccine tests were criticized for not sharing raw data" I'm sure that, if one searched hard enough, one could find such a criticism. However, most of the criticism centered around the fact that the vaccine was "approved" on the basis of nearly zero actual human data.
  - xiphias2 6y ago
    I saw only 1 open letter signed by lots of researchers which contained many problems with the experiment: the main one for me was that the results that were supposed to be from independent experiments were extremely highly correlated. The reason behind that correlation can be not enough original data (cheating) or bad processing, but the western researchers asked for the original data to find it out.
sroussey 6y ago
Anonymizing patient data is quite difficult. Try a Google search: "reidentifying" patient data
m463 6y ago
come on, it would be pretty easy to find out where it happened, who was treated and who was not treated. After you uncloak everything, you just send lawyers to the untreated people (the families of those who died) and start litigating. or you just let people know their loved ones didn't get the life-saving treatment and let them stew a while.
maerF0x0 6y ago
> It seems like it could have been anonymized. But maybe the consent was not given for such a usage. Even if anonymized, we must respect the guise under which the data was provided to the researchers.

xiphias2 6y ago

One interesting thing is that the Russian vaccine tests were criticized for not sharing raw data by lots of researchers from western countries as well. I'm definately taking vitamin D and not signing up for the Russian vaccine, but it seemed hypocrytical to me that only Russian researchers were shamed for not being transparent.

hcknwscommenter 6y ago
"One interesting thing is that the Russian vaccine tests were criticized for not sharing raw data" I'm sure that, if one searched hard enough, one could find such a criticism. However, most of the criticism centered around the fact that the vaccine was "approved" on the basis of nearly zero actual human data.
- xiphias2 6y ago
  I saw only 1 open letter signed by lots of researchers which contained many problems with the experiment: the main one for me was that the results that were supposed to be from independent experiments were extremely highly correlated. The reason behind that correlation can be not enough original data (cheating) or bad processing, but the western researchers asked for the original data to find it out.

sroussey 6y ago

Anonymizing patient data is quite difficult. Try a Google search: "reidentifying" patient data

m463 6y ago

come on, it would be pretty easy to find out where it happened, who was treated and who was not treated. After you uncloak everything, you just send lawyers to the untreated people (the families of those who died) and start litigating. or you just let people know their loved ones didn't get the life-saving treatment and let them stew a while.

maerF0x0 6y ago

> It seems like it could have been anonymized. But maybe the consent was not given for such a usage. Even if anonymized, we must respect the guise under which the data was provided to the researchers.