> The question here is about what is morally permissible in human-animal relations. The point is that the answer depends on whom you ask when you ask. Blanket

> The question here is about what is morally permissible in human-animal relations. The point is that the answer depends on whom you ask when you ask. Blanket discouragement of historically relevant example, such as Mengele is just censorship to make things look rosy. Are you disputing the fact that human experiments were considered eminently permissible by a large population of people ? If not, then how is such a fact not germane to the discussion. > Nature is full of exploitation that doesn't seem to bother those campaigning for animal rights. Judge, why do you want to put me in prison, so many others murder too. > I submit that what makes us different in this respect is that first, we have the capacity to understand what we're going and its immorality, and second, we have the capacity to choose otherwise. Exactly.