3 ms·

Did you check out NATS?

• tapirl 6y ago
  Both nsq and nats are very memory saving.
• synchrone 6y ago
  Was using it in production before. NATS itself is great and reliable. However disk persistency is done with nats-streaminh and i had big issues with it's Raft file based store, where it would stop accepting messages after a short network issue, and not get unstuck unless I destroy the whole nats-streaming data storage amd start from scratch. Also raft means 3x disk usage for one queue, since its fully replicated