The article about NSA "getting ISIS" mentioned: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24520757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24520757 Once there, see th

The article about NSA "getting ISIS" mentioned: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24520757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24520757 Once there, see the posts by bashinator and _kbh_ for other sources. Back to the topic here, the "technical glitches" were present throughout the process, as reported day after day on: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/ https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/ E.g. "This hearing has frequently been interrupted by the strange incompetence of the Ministry of Justice in establishing simple videolinks." "It was not Professor Feldstein’s fault the day finished in confused anti-climax. The court was unable to make the video technology work. For ten broken minutes out of about forty Feldstein was briefly able to give evidence, and even this was completely unsatisfactory as he and Mark Summers were repeatedly speaking over each other on the link." Also playing with the times: "Daniel Ellsberg was to give evidence this afternoon. Edward Fitzgerald QC applied for his videolink evidence to be heard at 3.15pm [(in England)] which is 07.15am in California where Dan lives. Baraitser insisted it could not be put back beyond 2.30 pm, thus forcing an 89 year old man [Daniel Ellsberg] to give evidence at 6.30am [(his local time)]. Simply stunning." The use of internet was also intentionally restricted: The judge "explained this by stating that the public could normally observe from within the courtroom, where she could control their behaviour. But if they had remote access, she could not control their behaviour and this was not in the “interests of justice”."